Homepage > Joss Whedon Cast > Charisma Carpenter > News > Charisma Carpenter - Has posing for Playboy hurt Charisma’s film (...)
« Previous : "Buffy" Star Marsters Gives All for Charity
     Next : Charisma Carpenter - The Division Trailer Screencaps »

From Newsrama.com

Charisma Carpenter

Charisma Carpenter - Has posing for Playboy hurt Charisma’s film career ?

By Jericho Wilson & Brady

Sunday 2 May 2004, by Webmaster

At Friday’s Wonder Woman panel Greg Rucka, Drew Johnson, and Dan Didio fielded questions ranging from storylines to sales to junior partners getting their own books.

The “Stoned” arc (it’s got Medousa in it) concludes in issue #210 with “pretty dramatic events,” Rucka said. Immediately following #210 will be a Wonder Woman-Flash crossover entitled “Truth or Dare.” In the two part story, Wally West and Wonder Woman are tethered together by Wonder Woman’s golden lasso, and get real with each other.

Superman will show up more in the series, now that Rucka is writing Adventures of Superman.

Cheetah will be coming back to the series soon.

When asked about DC movies, Rucka expressed mild frustration at the ability of Warner Brothers to successfully adapt DC characters to film, pointing to X2 as an example of a film which takes its comic book characters seriously and portrays them honestly.

When asked how much control DC has over characters like Wonder Woman being translated into other media, Didio said, “The real influence we have on other media is to tell the best stories we can.”

Rucka also commented that one-time frontrunner (in the eyes of some fans, at least) for the role of Wonder Woman, Charisma Carpenter more than likely ruined her chances by posing nude for Playboy.

Rucka said that there will indeed be a Wonder Woman equivalent of “Hush” for Batman, and the current Brian Azzarello/Jim Lee arc on Superman. When asked if such a defining, big storyline was coming, Rucka said, “Yes, very big. You may not like it, but it’s a good story.”

In discussing sales for Wonder Woman Rucka and Dan Didio said that the latest figures put the book at around 31,000 copies. Didio said he was happy with those figures because the series is steadily climbing up with each issue from prior to Rucka taking the series. The most recent peak was at #200 which saw roughly 40,000 copies move. In Rucka’s opinion, the series should be selling 80,000 copies a month.

When asked about a Wonder Girl series, the sales figures were again referenced as the reason why there is no book starring Cassie. Although, according to Rucka, Wonder Girl will be appearing for a “long stretch” in the series shortly.

Wonder Woman will be appearing in Adventures of Superman #628, although not in the way readers would expect, according to Rucka, who explained that the issues’ story deals with the relationship between Clark Kent, Lois Lane and Wonder Woman.

Wonder Woman will appear in Adventures #633 or #634.

Rucka, when asked why female characters have trouble gaining traction in the marketplace, said that while cheesecake seems to do well, offered that there may be a mild form of sexism going on the marketplace.

When asked about a romantic relationship, Rucka again said that, in his view, putting Wonder Woman in a romantic relationship seemed to be paramount in the eyes of many writers. Didio however, added that in his view, romance is a valid story element, and Rucka later added that he has, only recently, started seeing romantic possibilities for the character.

On how his writing of Wonder Woman has evolved, Rucka said that now, he can better see that her sense of humor being important to her character, as is her anger.

Steve Trevor will be returning to the series, as Rucka said that he recently found a way to put him into the series that he likes.


11 Forum messages

  • Why? It’s not like she’s Pamela Anderson or Any of the other females that constantly are in PlayBoy or some other media equal to it.
  • Have they seen wonder womans costume? It seems hypocrittical to me.
  • There’s sexism in the market place? I think not.

    Yes, there was at one time. But that era is done with. The late 90’s bridged a new era, and that was the age of the female super hero.

    Shows like Xena and Buffy became massively popular hits. And while the genre is fading soemwhat, we still have some shows with the theme of female hero.

  • I totally agree with that. How is she a postive role model? sorry she lost my respect when i heard about it. a female that poses nude shouldn’t be a postive role model :)
  • Replying to the post that a woman that poses nude shouldn’t be a positive role model. By that statement you have just ruled out Germaine Greer, Nicole Kidman, the ladies who posed nude to raise money for cancer in the UK, numerous athletes, Madonna, and many more too numerous to mention. Yeah I can see how absolutely none of these successful, independent career women are role models. Sheesh!
  • Please! All of this "positive role model" crap is just an excuse for parents not to actually raise their kids. Parents should never depend on a famous person to inpart values that they want their kids to have- this is their job. That being said, how is Charisma any less ’positive’ than she was before? She made a decision, with the input of her family, to appear nude in a magzine. The pictures were not crass and let’s face it Playboy is not Penthouse magazine. This Greg Rucka person is not producing this film, in all likelyhood he will have no say who is cast. Right now there isn’t even a ’movie’ to talk about.
  • I’m sure people thought that Charlize Theron & Drew Barrymore ruined their careers posing for Playboy. Let’s see.. Charlize just won an Oscar & Drew now has a star on the Hollywood walk of fame!!! They are sooo going down hill.

    And Wonder Woman is really a role model to young women in that outfit she wears. Tee-hee.

  • I won’t condemn Charisma for posing (which I have no right to do anyway). They are tasteful, clever and well-executed pictures and she wasn’t doing anything explicit or of such a nature.

    However I will point out that it just was not a wise move, she would have been better off posing (a little more clothed) for Maxim or some such magazine - which would frankly show off her body just as well - or, at least until her career took off (which, let’s face it, it hasn’t) and she had some real achievements under her belt (no pun intended...;D) so she couldn’t sink it before it launched.

    I don’t think she did anything WRONG or DISTASTEFUL, but I think it was an unwise career move.

  • The woman has had a baby and still has a hell of a figure-if you’ve got it, flaunt it!
  • > Has posing for Playboy hurt Charisma’s film career ?

    24 September 2004 07:00, by Anonymous

    Im not so sure it was an unwise career choice. Look at all of the sucessful women who have posed in it before.

    And as for Wonder Woman, thank gawd she isnt getting that role. I HATE Wonder Woman. Ugh.

  • are you have fun good time