From Awfulplasticsurgery.com
Eliza Dushku
Eliza Dushku - The Latest Plastic Surgery Victim ?
Sunday 12 September 2004, by Webmaster
Eliza Dushku was once a fresh faced girl. She’s been in many movies, ’Bring It On’ and ’City By The Sea’. Most notably, she’s been Faith on ’Buffy The Vampire Slayer’ and currently stars in ’Tru Calling’. Fans have noticed that her face has changed over the years, not as a result of maturity, but because of the plastic surgeon’s knife. Her nose and cheeks are discernibly different. Her face is wider because the cheek implants and the bridge of her nose looks more built up.
 33
Forum messages
-
12 September 2004 13:42, by Anonymous
why would she? she was quoted twice as being against plastic surgery. and the fotos look pretty much the same to me. the widness is because of the foto size. duh.
-
12 September 2004 13:47, by D’arcy
Or she could be, hum... how do you say it? Oh, yes! Fatter. What sort of an idiot would put implants on her cheeks if she looked like ED? In fact, just exactly who would do such a thing? She looked gorgeous a couple of years ago, why on Earth would she ruin her own body through plastic surgery? She just grew older and gained some weight. Big deal. Get over it already...
-
12 September 2004 13:57, by Cala
Oh Please!
She just put on some weight!
No surgery needed there!
-
12 September 2004 14:42, by puppet
This is the stupidest thing I have read. Eliza has just put on weight and is more chubby.
-
12 September 2004 14:58, by AngelFan17
That makes me sad...
-
12 September 2004 15:28, by Anonymous
do people not realize your cheeks will look bigger if you put on a bit of weight (which, is not actually a bad thing!)?? i doubt she had plastic surgery- there is hardly any change on those pictures except the fact she’s put on a small amount of weight making her face look healthier. also of course the lighting is different in the pictures which also can make her look different.
-
12 September 2004 17:34, by Anonymous
That seems like alot of bullshit to me. The first picture is cleary 2000 (maybe 2001 as it states) and she was very young.
The 2nd picture, however, looks like a newer picture of Eliza, and I do believe it is 100% maturity.
Whoever wrote this artice, it seems, needs to be some better research. My guess would be that he/she gathered there "information" from various images on the internet.
-
12 September 2004 17:57, by redemption_seeker
does anyone else notice that she was a lot tanner? who ever wrote that was stupid...yeah she put on some weight that’s probably a reason to but she still looks good...GO ELIZA! next they’ll be say she was abducted by aliens...*crickets chirp* okay that was lame...anyways yeah..don’t diss eliza people
-
12 September 2004 18:00, by Anonymous
If that’s the best comparison they can come up with, then I think it speaks volumes about how little Eliza has changed over the years.
-
12 September 2004 18:56, by angel of salvation
wow...i think it’s like...cause she tanner in one pic..and her hair is not so much pulled back as well...either way...SHE STILL LOOKS F***ING HOT! yeah...anyways...i don’t think she did get Plastic Surgery...i see no difference other than she is smiling more in the second picture...but that’s just my opinion
See online : > Eliza Dushku - The Latest Plastic Surgery Victim ?
-
12 September 2004 19:23, by Anonymous
maybe she has, but she cud just look different
-
12 September 2004 20:22, by Galen
Honestly, she looks better as she is. Nothing wrong with some meat on her bones, if anything it makes her look healthier.
Why would people get plastic surgery to make themselves larger, anyway? Seems to defeat the purpose when you consider that surgery generally tends to make people look smaller, or younger, or whatever.
Considering her vehemence aginst plastic surgery, why would she go against that and actually have cosmetic work done? That would ruin her credibility.
Honestly people... naw. No work has been done, and if anything that bit of maturity makes her look more beautiful. I’ve never been a fan of the skin-and-bones look myself.
-
12 September 2004 22:02, by Jaime
What a striking difference! (That was sarcasm, BTW.) She hasn’t had any work done—it’s obviously either a weight gain or her bone structure changing from hello! maturity. Many peoples’ face shape changes in their late teens, early twenties. And aside from that she’s totally against plastic surgery and she’s just too confident and gorgeous to even bother. Someone’s just trying to discredit her.
We love you, Eliza!!!
-
-
12 September 2004 22:33, by bunnies_frighten_me
1 - she looks better in the first pic!!
2 - the only difference i see is the skin colour from the sun exposure
3 - why is she on the site AWFULplasticsurgery.com ? even if she has had surgery its damn good!!!
4 - if she has had it, good for her!! i personally cant wait to have my first round of surgery
-
13 September 2004 06:34, by Thurisaz
I agree with what everyone else has said - she just seems to have more dimples in the second image because she’s simply smiling more.
Other than that, I see no difference that could not be attributed to weight or a tan.
Just who the bugger are these people who seemingly do nothing but look at photos of celebrities and speculate if they’ve had plasitc surgery? Tis a waste of time.
-
13 September 2004 06:54, by SUZY Q
NO NO NO shes has had NO Plastic Surgery done too her face....the only diffrence is she has a tan in the 2nd picture and shes smiling........
See online : Eliza Dushku-The Latest Plastic Surgery Victim?
-
13 September 2004 12:21, by ausie000
i think shes just put on a little weight and got a tan
-
14 September 2004 00:21, by J2U
Wintertime day makeup, Summertime night makeup, with tan. Plus the roundness most humans develop with maturity and regular meals.
Yes,stupid rumors!
-
14 September 2004 21:22, by Anonymous
Oh puh-lease! Eliza hasn’t had any work done! I’m pretty sure the 2nd pic is a newer one. She has just fatten up a bit and grown up. Maybe she didn’t even "got a tan", it could be just the picture’s brightness/contrast. Get a clue silly people!
-
15 September 2004 10:54, by BadGirl-Faith
Oh, Please, people...
Take a good look, Her whole face looks like she’s gained a bit oh weight.
So ridiculous rumour
-
20 September 2004 05:56, by Fiona
What absolute crap! Who makes up this stuff? She’s just got a bit older and filled out a tiny bit. "Noticeable difference" my arse! I do think her face has changed quite a bit, but only in the way most normal humans do, esp. during late teens/early twenties. Eliza’s always impressed me as being one of the few actresses (and women) who seems really confident and happy with herlooks.
-
30 March 2005 05:48, by germ
And, and these pics are supposed to support your argument? You’re far reaching here, and it doesn’t quite pan out.
-
23 April 2005 07:15, by Anonymous
no.. shes just smiling more in the later picture.. plus people change as they get older. thats retarded people are jumping to conclusions like that
-
24 April 2005 16:28, by Anonymous
Well, lately she’s looking pretty pale, and I still think her nose looks a little different. She just gained weight in her face, which is why it looks different. Although, I don’t know about her nose.
-
25 February 2006 16:54, by Anonymous
I think this is a really really really stupid thing to accuse Eliza of because she is so against it herself why would she go ahead and go under the knife if she hated it so much? Eliza looked perfect before hand and she still looks perfect now. Nobody in their right mind would go in and get implants on their cheeks unless it was a dream of theirs they have been waiting to do forever! I have liked Eliza for around 6 - 7 years now maybe even longer and it is so horrible when you read things like this that is dragging her through the mud. Don’t you agree? She has maybe gained a lil’ weight and there is absoloutly nothing wrong with that because it just shows she looks after herself and that she isn’t one of these stupid hollywood stars that starve themselves to be skinny a lil’ bit of weight is better than being ill just to be noticed. And in my opinion its stars ike Eliza that actually look sexy which get more attention don’t you think? Anyways i have blabbed on long enough and to the point... I think Eliza is amazing and i love her and she HAS NOT HAD IMPLANTS OR A NOSE JOB lol And i know the majority of you people out there agree with me...
-
21 July 2006 21:29, by shannon
How about maybe she gained some weight....
-
22 July 2006 03:51, by Jessica
The only thing noticebly different in these pictures is the tan.
-
22 July 2006 05:28, by Anonymous
its the same nose......she is just tan in that picture
-
4 August 2006 18:57, by Michelle, Boston, MA
Eliza clearly did not have surgery—she just grew up a bit and gained a little weight. You can tell if you compare full-body shots of her in 1999 (when she started on Buffy) and 2003 (Season 7) or now. She’s was and is very sexy, and I think her beauteous curves make her stand out even more amongst the sickly, disgusting Barbie-Doll lookalikes. And it also makes her dimples more emphatic, which I think makes her even cuter. So I say Eliza looks great!
-
23 August 2006 19:40, by Anonymous
now she looks kinda ugly and weird looking ... why would she do that she was gorgeous before !its too bad that she did that ...
-
10 June 2007 13:29, by thechosen one
thats the most ludicrous idea ive heard n seen .. the faces r the same except she has a bit of healthy looking weight that makes her face look fuller and livelier!
so i say its great that shes looking so good n stop tryin 2 make people get sick with stupid paparazzi ideas!
-
20 March 2009 20:57, by alias
seriously???? get a damn life and leave people like her alone... you want to trash someone look at the people who are ALWAYS in the tabs.
|
|
Sitemap XML