Home page > Cast > Sarah Michelle Gellar > Spoilers > Sarah Michelle Gellar’s ’Grudge’ Against Buffy - (...)
« Previous : Sarah Michelle Gellar - ’The Grudge’ Movie - Extra Quality Promotional Photo 4
     Next : Angel Season 5 Set - Medium Quality Photos »

From Syfyportal.com

Sarah Michelle Gellar’s ’Grudge’ Against Buffy - Spoilers

By Scott Nance

Saturday 13 November 2004, by Webmaster


I saw a new “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” episode last weekend. Well, at least at first I thought it was a new “Buffy” episode. It was the same blonde figure, with the familiar inflections in her voice, facing off against supernatural beings of questionable origin and even more questionable motive.

But, then, it wasn’t really “Buffy” after all. We were sitting in a dark movie theater watching Sarah Michelle Gellar star in the new horror flick, “The Grudge.”

But throughout the film, I couldn’t help but have these feelings ... these, well, I’ll call them “Buffy flashes.” For those moments, I wasn’t watching Gellar’s character, Karen Davis, battle vengeful Japanese ghosts. I was watching Buffy Summers.

But then the illusion was broken just as quickly as it came. Because unlike the Slayer, except at the very end, Karen Davis never really fought back. As the monsters kept confronting Karen, I kept saying to myself, “Kick their ass, Buffy.” But until her boyfriend was already dead, Karen just took it.

These “Buffy flashes” were certainly just brief moments throughout the film — and in general, Gellar did a fine job of portraying a terrified young woman — but as fleeting as the Buffy flashes were, they were without doubt there.

Given Gellar’s ongoing public conflict with her television alter-ego, then it is surprising she would continue to take roles that are so similar to her work on “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.”

Certainly, some of the antipathy between Gellar and the character that made her famous is simply manufactured by media looking for a quick story. Last spring, for instance, she was absent from the final episodes of the spinoff “Angel,” and many gossipmongers took it to be an intentional snub. It turns out that was way offbase. She simply was busy — way over in Japan, no less — shooting “The Grudge,” and couldn’t get away to reunite with the Fang Gang.

But other times, Gellar continues to vent so much spleen that it makes it actually seem as if there are some bona fide lingering bad feelings there.

In comments posted on the BBC Web site, the actress recently said, "You think about it ever year for eight years [sic]: when is the right time? But all the signs pointed to the eighth year. I was emotionally and physically exhausted. I wasn’t being challenged in the way that I needed any more.

“I really didn’t have any (input). Maybe I should have, ’cause then we wouldn’t have got so lost. It took me a while to work up the nerve to say something.

“It didn’t feel like ’Buffy.’ But it’s easy to be vocal now, because (series creator Joss Whedon) isn’t going to be yelling at me tomorrow.”

Yikes! That’s a fairly gratuitous comment to make more than a year after the show went off the air — even if there is some actual truth to it.

The question to Gellar is: Why couldn’t you have just left well enough alone? Why do you feel the need to be so “vocal”?

Gellar’s ongoing, public struggle with an old character, of course, is nothing new to science-fiction.

Leonard Nimoy played out a similar feud with his celebrated “Star Trek” character, going as far as penning an autobiography to renounce the relationship with his alter ego, titled “I Am Not Spock.” Nimoy, however, had the good sense to realize that if you want to separate yourself from a past character, you actually have to take roles that are different from the character you’re trying to escape. After Trek originally went off the air, Nimoy threw himself in a variety of diverse roles, including Shakespearean work.

But, whether it’s “The Grudge” or the “Scooby Doo” movies — in which, again she’s a member of a gang of kids fighting monsters — she keeps taking high-profile roles that invite easy comparison back to her years as Buffy.

That she vacillates between bad-mouthing Buffy and taking roles that are so akin to her makes for interesting psychological speculation. It also makes for yet another comparison, this time between Gellar and her erstwhile co-star, Alyson Hannigan.

Hannigan seems to made a peace with her “Buffy” character, Willow, that appears to have eluded Gellar. The redhaired actress made so much of a name for herself away from “Buffy” with her appearances in the successful “American Pie” comedies that — believe it or not — outside of sci-fi, Hannigan is arguably even better known as Michele, “the band camp girl” than as Willow, the lesbian witch.

Hannigan also seems confident enough with her success that not only has she not criticized her time on “Buffy,” she was — unlike Gellar — willing to reprise her role for the planned “Buffy” animated spinoff.

With her “American Pie” achievements to her credit, both creatively and financially, Hannigan clearly doesn’t need to hang on to “Buffy” forever to ensure the future of her career. However, she comes back to role clearly because she believes in her character and in “Buffy” as a quality project.

Meanwhile, back to Gellar. To find her own professional peace of mind, she doesn’t have to be the next Meryl Streep tomorrow. But a nice little romantic comedy might not be bad.


Reply to this article

5 Forum messages

  • In one paragraph he states how the media manufacture stories about Sarah for their own purposes (giving the example of how her reasons for not appearing in the final episodes of Angel were widely misrepresented) but then straight after goes on to reproduce the quotes from the recent Big Issue article as seen on the BBC Cult website. However now they are even more easily taken out of context due to him "filling in the blanks" by making his own determination about what Sarah was saying, rather than actually pointing out that these are just three lines from an entire inerview and that for all he knows she may actually have been joking around with the "Joss yelling" comment.

    Seems to me like you can’t accuse the media of making up their own opinions one minute and then go on to do the exact same thing with limited information yourself in the exact same article.

    I thought that this example of third hand information and chinese whisper journalism was a very apt way of proving how even the most trusted media sources can fuel the rumour mill.

    For what it’s worth, in the latest edition of Esquire, Gellar is quoted as saying how proud she is of the show. "I truly believe that it is one of the greatest shows of all time and it will go down in history as that. And I don’t feel that that is a cocky statement. We changed the way that people looked at television."

    I find both SMG and DB comment’s that we’ve seen in articles interesting. Of course we’ve seen comments from both them that are taken out of context. David himself at the Halloween event basically said to not pay attention to anything derogatory you may have heard from him about reappearing as Angel.

    What I’ve YET to see is anything similar from AH or JM or others as far as negative comments. Perhaps what SMG and DB say, they say in jest, or only part of what they say gets made public. BUT, they said these things (as far as we know), no matter the context. As we’ve all seen, JM does nothing but worship Whedon, I don’t think I’ve ever seen him or AH say anything negative about the ’verse. To me, the less fodder you give them the less likely articles like this one will appear and I think AH and JM know that.

    Is it possible that AH and JM simply are more careful than others, more aware of how things can be taken when interviewed? I personally think they’d simply never bite the hand that fed them for so long. Not knocking SMG or anybody, or their right to point out the "not so good" as well as the good. Maybe the JMs and AHs simply aren’t being as truthful/open, I don’t know.

    Don’t know where I’m going with this, I just find it interesting that the ones that reportedly make the less than stellar comments are the same people time and time again. (Yes, I know the same comments get quoted til the end of time, especially if they’re on the more negative side, thus making them more than they probably were meant to be).

    Anyway, just batting some observations around...

    Reply to this message

  • I love SMG’s work even the scooby doo.."I know shame on me"...but honestly it doesn’t matter what movie she is in or what character she’s playing she will always be Buffy to me.....

    Reply to this message

  • Obviously there is no sure way to know what is truth and what is fiction because we were not there and we all know the press loves a scandal... but when I read this I immediately thouught back to when the show was ending and Freddie started bad mouthing certian people saying SMG was under appreciated and taken for granted. I remembered that whilst I respected SMG’s decision and Joss’s decision to call it quits after 7 Freddies comments really grated with me. Then recently she has been quoted as saying things on behalf of her fans like the qoute about how they don’t want a cartoon and that really annoyed me too. That SMG may or may not have made these big issue comments is inconsequential, it’s the fact that she contiually has been dissing the show and it hurts to hear it. I myself was waiting with baited breath to hear her admit she had finished with the show but now I find myself wishing she had never opened her mouth about it. I remember a fan wrote an email to Fury during S7 and asked about Faith’s return and if Buffy was being built up by tearing Faith’s character down. The episode had not yet aired but spoilers were all over the net and he admitted it was so, because the show was called ’Buffy’ the Vampire Slayer. Thankfully when the episode aired the tearing down so to speak had lessened and I remember thinking, good, that’s no way to build someone up. That’s what I liken this to, Sarah is trying to break away and stand on her own merit, but she does this by tearing down Buffy the character she played for 7 years and when she does it comes across as resentment for writers and others involved. Lots of people worked hard on this show. She is entitled to her opinion just as fans are but lots of people worked their guts off on this show, not just Sarah and with that in mind I do find her comments mildly hurtful.

    Reply to this message

  • Yes, I was in the "middle" of the Save Star Trek mania. At least we got a box set of feature movies, and how many spin-off TV shows? 4, 5? (ok, STNG, ST-V, ST-DS9, and Enterprise). I guess that’s four (some might count "T.J. Hooker".

    I guess I’m not so tv web public, to hear of Sarah’s "public" airings. I never hear anything (that can believed to be real).

    The only Buffy DVD extra I saw her on, was the Once More, With Feeling featurette (and shocked me. Hey! Sarah. She never did comment or anything._

    I just miss her. Sarah, tell me, what would Buffy do?

    See online : I knew I’d miss her, Had to Keep her, She’s Buried in my Backyard

    Reply to this message

  • Sarah Michelle Gellar’s ’Grudge’ Against Buffy - Spoilers

    10 November 2007 21:50, by pooper scooper
    wow you seem awfully harsh on sarah. i mean i get that you don’t think she should have said anything, but can we all just ignore how awfully buffy was written during the sixth and seventh seasons. i’m not talking her storylines, i’m talking her as a character. it seems as if they had forgotten who these people were, they were just blank slates who said their lines. i agree with SMG on that fact, they got so lost after leaving the wb that they buffy was no longer present in the show, and i don’t think that relaying that to her fans is a no no. if i recall correctly SMG was trying to keep the wb from cancelling buffy, even willing to take a pay cut, but joss was offended in the low budget for the show that he was unwilling to compromise. so don’t blame it all on her

    Reply to this message