Friday 2 December 2005, by Anonymous :

as much as i would LOVE to see another Serenity/Fierfly sequel movie thing, i think they shouldn’t do it if its going to be low budget. the ’Serenity’ movie was amazing, and it would be such a shame if the next legacy of ’Serenity’ was limited by cash and couldn’t be as spectacular as the last one

Saturday 3 December 2005, by Sara Beth :

I tend to disagree - The original Firefly episodes were made on a "TV" budget and were spectacular. I am sure a Sci Fi movie like this would get more than a tv budget. I think continuing the story line with a limited budget would be preferable to not having it. If the characters and plot are there for this movie, then in my opinion, the fancy sets and CGI special effects are all just extras we could live without.

The more copies of Serenity we buy for family and friends at Xmas, the better chance of the storyline getting a chance to continue on somewhere. Keep Flying!!

Friday 9 December 2005, by michael :

You take a ship in the air you don’t love, she’ll shake you off quicker than... ?

"Firefly", "Whedon", "Low Quality" are contradictions in terms.

These comments are an anwser to this article : Rumours surface about Serenity sequel airing on Sci Fi Channel

« Previous comment to : Firefly - "Serenity" Movie - Good Quality Behind The Scenes Photos 2
     Next comment to : James Marsters & Alexis Denisof - "Ops" Pilot - Casting Tidbits »