|
Wednesday 29 September 2004, by Anonymous : That looks like some kind of burn, not a nipple. It’s much too high on her chest. She looks very pretty, though. I like her eyes.Wednesday 29 September 2004, by SUSAN : Michelles nipple looks funny in High resolution.....looks more like a birth mark.....What happened to her nipple lolololololWednesday 29 September 2004, by Anonymous : ahahahahaa! omg. hawt. Wednesday 29 September 2004, by Kate : I agree. That just doesn’t look like a nipple.. So, whatever.Wednesday 29 September 2004, by Anonymous : no, it doesn’t look like a nipple for goodness sakes - it looks like part of the areola. nipple looks like its still hiding. hahahha. what a hoot.Wednesday 29 September 2004, by Anonymous : Hmm...*notes high percentage of female posters*Wednesday 29 September 2004, by Anonymous : I saw that the first time those pics were posted. But yeah, that’s definitely not the actual nipple, just some surrounding area.Wednesday 29 September 2004, by Anonymous : In response to the very first comment about this ’article’: She was at some event a couple of months back - the MTV awards, maybe - and in a couple of the pictures you could see them outlined pretty clearly thru her dress, and I remember noticing then how high they were. Higher than the average woman, I’d say. Her figure probably has something to do with that - remember that she’s built much more like Amy Acker than Charisma Carpenter. Tho at least with Michelle and Amy you don’t have to wonder whether they’re real or not. Just one of the reasons I find them both far sexier than CC. ;) Thursday 7 October 2004, by Anonymous : I just have one question. How old was she when this picture was taken?? if she was still 17. and then thats not right!!These comments are an anwser to this article : Michelle Trachtenberg - "Mysterious Skin" Dinner - High Resolution Nipple ?!
|
Sitemap XML