Thursday 10 March 2005, by Anonymous :

Gosh, she looks like a ho... :-( She is a reasonably talented actress, but if she sells out right now (and she’s only 20), that would be it - she isn’t famous yet... They should hire whoever picks her clothes. On the other hand, the picture #4 was pretty cool. :)

Thursday 10 March 2005, by Anonymous :

I like pics 2, 4, and 6. All the rest of them make her look like some drug addicted teenager...

Thursday 10 March 2005, by Anonymous :

Yes.

I. agree.

I. Am. Extremley. Dissapointed. She’ll. Be. Stripping. For. Playboy. In. A. Couple. Of. Years.



Thursday 10 March 2005, by SUSAN :

I never liked these photos when I first saw them a while back..My views hasnt changed....

Thursday 10 March 2005, by Anonymous :

Geez, lay off the girl... Its called "photography" She doesnt choose how she looks on the pictures, the photographer does. I think these are some very good photographs, it doesnt make her a ’slut’ or a ’ho’, girls 5 years younger walk around the streets wearing half as much as she’s wearing in these photos.

Thursday 10 March 2005, by Anonymous :

she looks like a slut..and we know what means photography dude...and i think that 4 a girl so young had to be a better thinked photoshoot..not that makeup that makes her look like some addicted..or some prostitute or r u going to say that she looks like a normal teen?? NOOOO she looks so crapy..so ...so well u know...

Thursday 10 March 2005, by Dawn :

Please.leave her alone. she will not be stripping for playboy any time. she has a lot more class than that. she even said that she wouldn’t degrade herself by doing that. as someone said, she doesn’t choose the way the pics are. she’s a very admirable actress, who shouldn’t get put down for such stupid things

Friday 11 March 2005, by Anonymous :

oh for crying out loud. The photographer tried and new look with her. So the style doesn’t suit her, but she doesn’t look bad!

Friday 11 March 2005, by Anonymous :

You people saying she looks "slutty" and all didn’t say anything with SMG’s photoshoot in which she ONLY had a cardboard heart covering her body. Get over it, Michelle Trachtenberg is NOT Dawn and she’s NOT a cute little teenager anymore - she’s almost 20 years old! Eliza Dushku was doing sluttier stuff in the show at a young age, go call her a slut too, while you’re at it!

Friday 11 March 2005, by Anonymous :

Edgy,slutty,dark,whatever.... The fifth picture makes me literally salivate.

Wednesday 16 March 2005, by Anonymous :

Okay, not to be a perv, but does anyone else see her nipples? Because I certainly do. O_O!

Thursday 24 March 2005, by Anonymous :

its flaunt magazine... obviously some of you know nothing about what her being in that says about her... i always thought she was a nick kids star, but this is hott— and edgey and raw— so high fashion... fuck buffy, she can be fierce on her own.

These comments are an anwser to this article : Michelle Trachtenberg - Flaunt Magazine #55 Photoshoot - High Quality Photos

« Previous comment to : Kill your TV - but keep your DVD player (angel & buffy mention)
     Next comment to : Joss Whedon - "Astonishing X-Men" Comic Book - Vote for Marvel’s Cover of the year »