Homepage > Joss Whedon Cast > David Boreanaz > News > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive
« Previous : Richard Dean Anderson Website Offers Some Interviews of the cast & crew of Stargate SG-1
     Next : David Boreanaz - Unpublished Photoshoot - High Resolution Photos I »

From Tvguide.com

David Boreanaz

David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

By Michael Ausiello

Wednesday 18 August 2004, by Webmaster

Rumors that David Boreanaz is not up for an Angel movie are utterly bloodless. The ex-vamp is willing to take another turn at bat, but not on the tube. "It would have to be a theatrical release," he tells TV Guide Online. "I’m not into the movie-of-the-week [idea]."

Last month at the Television Critics Association press tour, WB execs remained hopeful that Angel would someday be reborn into a series of small-screen flicks. But network chairman Garth Ancier conceded that it would take "a little coaxing" to get Boreanaz interested. "I know they wanted to do, like, six films," Boreanaz says, "It’s not that I’m against it; it just needs to be a bigger challenge. When you do something for five seasons, you want to continue to challenge yourself... go to another level with it rather than just doing the same thing you’ve been doing."

With that in mind, Boreanaz recently shot the title role in the big-screen comedy Mr. Fix It. "It has a very ’80s romantic theme to it," he says. "I’m going to be doing some dancing, singing... it’s going to be a lot of fun." He’s also in talks to co-star in a high-profile franchise flick that he insists is not Superman. "It’s better," he teases, adding, "’Four’ would be the magic number - that’s all I’m going to say." (Our guess? It’s the in-the-works fourth Indiana Jones pic.)

In the meantime, "I’m really having fun with leaving the show and doing roles that are, for me, expressing what I love to do," Boreanaz says. "[It’s great] not being tied down to a series for nine months out of the year. It really is refreshing to see myself going into another arena."


From Star-ecentral.com :

Boreanaz quashes Angel rumours

David Boreanaz spoke to TV Guide, and quashed rumours that he’s not up for an Angel movie. The actor, however, sets things straight by saying that he’s not exactly keen on making telemovies.

"It would have to be a theatrical release," he says. "I’m not into the movie-of-the-week [idea]."

Apparently Warner Bros. execs were interested in bringing back Angel as small-screen flicks. "I know they wanted to do, like, six films," Boreanaz said, "It’s not that I’m against it; it just needs to be a bigger challenge. When you do something for five seasons, you want to continue to challenge yourself... go to another level with it rather than just doing the same thing you’ve been doing."

With that laid to rest, Boreanaz will next be seen playing the title role in the comedy Mr. Fix It; and after that, he might turn up in a high-profile franchise film, which he insists is not Superman.

Teasingly the hunky star said: "It’s better - ’Four’ would be the magic number - that’s all I’m going to say."

Hmm, now would that ’four’ be fantastic, jurassic, or just plain Indy. Stay tuned, we promise we’ll keep you informed.


From Comingsoon.net :

David Boreanaz on Angel Movie & New Project

TV Guide chatted with actor David Boreanaz who says the rumors he’s not up for an Angel movie are nonsense. He’s willing to go another round, but not on TV.

"It would have to be a theatrical release," he says. "I’m not into the movie-of-the-week [idea]."

WB execs said they were interested in doing TV films. "I know they wanted to do, like, six films," Boreanaz added, "It’s not that I’m against it; it just needs to be a bigger challenge. When you do something for five seasons, you want to continue to challenge yourself... go to another level with it rather than just doing the same thing you’ve been doing."

Next up for Boreanaz is the comedy Mr. Fix It and he’s also signed up for another high-profile franchise film that he insists is not Superman. "It’s better," he teases, adding, "’Four’ would be the magic number - that’s all I’m going to say."

He could mean Jurassic Park 4, Fantastic Four, or Indiana Jones 4. We’ll let you know when we find out more.


14 Forum messages

  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    18 August 2004 20:39, by roidoid
    Couldn’t be the Fantastic Four movie, could it?
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    18 August 2004 20:39, by Anonymous
    Or the Jurassic Park 4 movie!
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    18 August 2004 21:41, by Gonzalo
    As far as I know, it is Alexis Denisof the one who will appear on the Fantastic Four movie as Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic.
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    18 August 2004 21:57, by Anonymous
    Nothing new. This is exactly what he’s said before, that he’s not interested in what Joss and the WB are considering: TV movies.
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    18 August 2004 22:09, by Nonni
    I bet it’s the Fantastic Four movie. I heard something about it a little while back. Im gonna see it no matter what it is.
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    19 August 2004 01:29, by Anonymous
    It is kinda lame that DB doesn’t want to do tv movies....but i admit I’d rather go to the movies and pay 10 bucks rather than turning on my tv.There’s more of a ...somthing or other PLUS it might just give the WB another blow...like HAHA you losers gave up ANGEL and now senor joss is on the big big screen again (after serenity:))!!!!!!!!!!! A BUFFY/ANGEL MOVIE........BETTER.....A BUFFY MOVIE.....AND AN ANGEL MOVIE....EVEN BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    19 August 2004 07:25, by Anonymous
    this is a bummer here for me because on the one side, i’m glad that David Boreanaz the actor is enjoying what else is out there and that he’s getting roles. but then on the other side, I really miss Angel and i wish i could see it! ::Sighs:: STill.. i’m glad for him.
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    19 August 2004 15:32, by Anonymous
    well i can understand why he isnt doing a tv movie—you dont make a lot of money-its a waste and if they dont put it on the right time or day of the week-no one is going to watch it. smart choice david is doing by saying-no little screen angel-yes big screen angel.
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    19 August 2004 16:53, by yungmunk
    DB would be a great young Indiana Jones...or Han Solo (I doubt that could ever happen though). I think it’s more likely he’ll be in Fantastic Four. Wouldn’t it be great for him to take over Indiana???
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    19 August 2004 21:33, by Anonymous
    how old is that article, the old title Mr Fix it, isn’t used since weeks, it’s the perfect lie the title.
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    20 August 2004 17:12, by Anonymous

    Hate to burst bubbles but i believe Ioan Gruffudd from King Arthur is gonna be reed richards (although i’d LOVE it to be AD, Ioan is very cool too.. :D)

    and the rest have been cast too, and i heard the bad guy is gonna be Julien Mcmahon from Nip/Tuck, so i’d guess hes talking indy 4...

  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    21 August 2004 05:35, by Anonymous

    Evidently DB seems to think he’s some kind of superstar, when he’s only had one "major" role in his entire career. One role, mind you, that would have nothing without Joss’ words coming out of his mouth. DB has nothing on his resume that gives him the power to demand "theatrical releases" only... silly fool, he’ll have to learn the hard way, that he should take the work when it comes his way, and that he should never bite the hand the fed him HANDILY for his entire career.

    I do not want to see anything Angel/Buffy related on the WB — screw them — but if you think we won’t follow Joss to any other network, then you’re as clueless as the WB. They could make a quality movie on cable as easily as the big screen, without ripping us off for $8-10 a ticket... Joss would not have anything but quality.

    DB may have a few roles going for him now, but he is no leading man in the movie industry, no matter he wants to believe — he’s not exactly getting very good offers; can you say straight to video? Much of the genius that was Angel, had nothing to with DB. Same goes for Buffy and SMG... if DB was smart, he’d see how "great" SMG’s career is now and learn something from that. Scooby-Doo instead of Buffy??? Please... SMG would be wise to steer clear of all her husband’s projects.

    Mr. Fix-It or whatever it may be called now... c’mon. Angel was great because he was a sulky, brooding, tortured soul... not because he was a charismatic, jovial chap. DB has never come off as an awesome personality in interviews either... kinda boring and much like SMG, seemingly annoyed with the mention of Buffy/Angel!

    People will see DB’s new movie because they loved Angel, and will no doubt leave sadly disappointed.

  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    27 August 2004 05:24, by Anonymous
    i don’t think they would be "ripping us off" if there were to be an angel movie!!!like I said/typed before i’d honestly rather see angel on the big screen than a tv movie.I think it kind of cheapens or lowers ANGEL.Its a great story(ies) and the whole whedonverse is utterly genius.well i couldn’t write it!.Even if DB hasn’t had a lot of movie roles I don’t think it was wrong of him to say "i don’t want to do angel TV movies." I don’t really think he’s "demanding" angel to be on the big screen either.where did my point go?oh yeah.DB is not a big old "I think i’m too good for tv"-dude and its better for ANGEL to return on the BIG screen.that guy or gal that was critizing..!!!.....you said that it would suck if Joss would do the tv movies for the WB..because you said em.."screw them"....so can i ask what exactly you were complaining about?! DB is great and ANGEL is great.Whedon is great.And i would go see the ANGEL movie as if it were the new star wars movie....as in..A LOT of times!!!!!
  • > David Boreanaz Keeps Angel Alive

    14 September 2004 19:01, by Anonymous
    I think a big screen movie is a great idea. No network deserves to have these telemovies run. Considering no network would pick them up. I would totally pay the $10 to go and see an Angel/Buffy movie in the theatre