David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

Portfolio

Reply to this article

9 Forum messages

• > David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

  7 June 2005 03:53, by jo

  Hello, Salty Goodness.

  Reply to this message

• > David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

  7 June 2005 12:56, by Anonymous

  agree, but lose the funny stubbly bum-fluff and dodgy hairdo

  Reply to this message

• > David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

  7 June 2005 14:52, by darkraven

  Mmmmmmm...David! Can’t wait to see him back on TV again!

  Reply to this message

• > David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

  7 June 2005 18:02, by Anonymous

  he looks incredibly hot!!

  Reply to this message

• > David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

  12 June 2005 03:27, by alphie13

  I’m not happy about that colour suit he’s wearing. It’s not flattering, I’d like to see him in a midnight blue velvet jacket for evening, and brown worsted (Long) for day. I like his hair a little longer and styled straight back, a light brown. MMM-MMM.But definitely keep that gorgeous smile.

  Reply to this message

• > David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

  12 June 2005 06:26, by Mo Angel

  Like Faith said, ’Hey, GQ’. There’s a layout here somewhere!

  Reply to this message

• > David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

  24 July 2005 02:47, by I’m me, who are you?

  he looks old, these pics are terrible, he looks fat and U.G.L.Y

  Reply to this message

• > David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

  25 July 2005 20:48, by Anonymous

  Lots of forehead. I prefer him in his Angel clothes :)

  Reply to this message

• > David Boreanaz - Fox Upfront 2005 Photoshoot - Medium Quality Photos

  4 December 2005 12:00, by Anonymous

  “He looks old fat ugly” Hi spike fan being mean about David won’t help james.

  Reply to this message